扶摇AI知识笔记AI 前沿知识库
首页 / 视觉模型 / 正文
视觉模型

ReFigBench: Benchmarking Scientific Figure Reconstruction as Editable PowerPoint Artifacts

来源:arXiv cs.CV 论文速递 约 2281 字 multimodal
arXiv cs.CV
转载

本文转载自 arXiv cs.CV,版权归原作者及原发布平台所有。本站仅作知识整理与转载分享,如涉版权问题请联系客服删除。

01核心要点

  • Multimodal coding agents are expected to turn visual inputs into usable artifacts, and they act through a harness, the layer of tools, context management, and execution environment around the model.
  • Existing evaluations often isolate short tool calls, API traces, or screenshot resemblance, and a low score under these proxies cannot say whether the model saw poorly, planned poorly, or was failed by its harness.
  • We study scientific overview figure reconstruction, an agent task in which a source image must become an editable PowerPoint slide that preserves text, topology, layout, and native docum

02正文全文

Abstract:Multimodal coding agents are expected to turn visual inputs into usable artifacts, and they act through a harness, the layer of tools, context management, and execution environment around the model. Existing evaluations often isolate short tool calls, API traces, or screenshot resemblance, and a low score under these proxies cannot say whether the model saw poorly, planned poorly, or was failed by its harness. We study scientific overview figure reconstruction, an agent task in which a source image must become an editable PowerPoint slide that preserves text, topology, layout, and native document structure. We introduce ReFigBench, a benchmark and evaluation framework built on 1,000 real overview figures retrieved from arXiv papers with full provenance. Coding agents from four model families reconstruct every figure under two workflows, direct code generation and a specialized PPTX workflow, and the strongest model runs inside two commercial harnesses, yielding ten configurations. Evaluation combines deterministic artifact checks, repeated automated scoring by judges from two model families, and blinded human comparisons. Perception remains a bottleneck that iterative rendering only partly repays. Whether workflow effort converts into quality depends on the model together with its harness, since the same model gains from the specialized workflow inside one harness and loses inside the other, and the harness shifts scores even under an identical direct prompt. The specialized workflow erases native connectors in every configuration, human judges still prefer its renderings in most matchups, and even the strongest agent falls short of the rubric ceiling. These results expose the tension between fidelity and editability as the central challenge for practical multimodal document agents.

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

03原文直达

本文内容转载自 arXiv cs.CV,如需查看原排版、配图与最新修订,请访问原始出处。

阅读原文(arXiv cs.CV)

下载论文 PDF

正在校验阅读权限…
RELATED

相关阅读

更多 视觉模型