扶摇AI知识笔记AI 前沿知识库
首页 / 前沿探索 / 正文
前沿探索

Prepared Or Unprepared? Evaluating Healthcare Workforce Readiness for Clinical Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Nigeria

来源:arXiv cs.AI 论文速递 约 2354 字 rsi
arXiv cs.AI
转载

本文转载自 arXiv cs.AI,版权归原作者及原发布平台所有。本站仅作知识整理与转载分享,如涉版权问题请联系客服删除。

01核心要点

  • Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into healthcare systems worldwide, yet its successful clinical adoption depends critically on workforce readiness, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where infrastructural and training gaps persist.
  • This cross-sectional study evaluated awareness, attitudes, preparedness, and barriers to AI adoption among 761 healthcare professionals across multiple disciplines and practice settings in Nigeria.
  • Data were collected between December 2025 and March 2026 using a structured, validated questionnaire.

02正文全文

Abstract:Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into healthcare systems worldwide, yet its successful clinical adoption depends critically on workforce readiness, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where infrastructural and training gaps persist. This cross-sectional study evaluated awareness, attitudes, preparedness, and barriers to AI adoption among 761 healthcare professionals across multiple disciplines and practice settings in Nigeria. Data were collected between December 2025 and March 2026 using a structured, validated questionnaire. Overall awareness of AI in healthcare was high (92.6%); however, objective knowledge and self-reported preparedness remained limited, with 40.9% reporting low or very low knowledge and only 63.0% feeling adequately prepared. Willingness to adopt AI was high: 92.5% expressed interest in training, and 78.7% supported inclusion of AI education in undergraduate curricula. Key barriers included lack of training (84.7%), poor infrastructure (71.1%), high cost of AI tools (61.0%), fear of job displacement (60.6%), ethical concerns (52.9%), and data privacy concerns (52.7%). Significant differences in preparedness were observed across geopolitical zones (chi-square (5) = 24.28, p < 0.001), and awareness differed across professional groups (chi-square (6) = 68.38, p < 0.001). Attitudes toward AI differed significantly across professional groups (F = 3.32, p = 0.003), with professionals who felt prepared demonstrating more positive attitudes (mean = 3.74) compared to those who did not (mean = 3.46). These findings reveal a critical disconnect between high awareness and actual readiness, underscoring the need for targeted training, infrastructure investment, and clear implementation frameworks to bridge the gap between AI technological potential and clinical reality in resource-constrained settings.

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

03原文直达

本文内容转载自 arXiv cs.AI,如需查看原排版、配图与最新修订,请访问原始出处。

阅读原文(arXiv cs.AI)

下载论文 PDF

正在校验阅读权限…
RELATED

相关阅读

更多 前沿探索